This contains UNCERTIFIED COPY for information/reference. For authentic copy, please refer to certified copy only.  In case of any mistake, please bring it to our notice.


LegalB's Resources for Africa
QUICK LINKS: ROOT DATABASE | OVERVIEW | VERSIONS & TEXT ACCESS TIMELINE | SUBORDINATE TEXTS | COMMENTARY | POTENTIAL TRANSGRESSOR LISTS | TEST FOR TRANSGRESSIONS | EMAIL A REQUEST FOR UPDATES | HELP | CONTACT US | SEARCH SITE | LOG OUT |

South Africa
NATIONAL LEGISLATION OVERVIEWS
LegalB Logo
Executive Members’ Ethics Act, No. 82 of 1998

Long title


To provide for a code of ethics governing the conduct of members of the Cabinet, Deputy Ministers and members of provincial Executive Councils; and to provide for matters connected therewith.

Table of contents

SECTION TITLE
1. Definitions
2. Code of ethics
3. Public Protector to investigate breaches
4. Complaints
5. Appointment and dismissal of Cabinet members, Deputy Ministers and MECS not affected
6. Criminal prosecutions not affected
7. Short title

Legislation Text Access Point

Versions
[To check whether a version has commenced, and how it was commenced, please see the Timeline for the Act, and the Annotated Text for the version.]
Access Official Gazette PDF  Request Subscription Fee Subscriber Access
As unamended Act 1998_082_000_19981028 EXT.LINK REQ.INFO LINK

* LegalB refers to a "version" of an Act or its sections in the format 
"YYYY_NNN_SSS_YYYYMMDD", which refers to "YEAR OF ACT_ACT NUMBER_SECTION OF ACT_DATE OF GAZETTE", and where "DATE OF GAZETTE" refers to the "YEAR_MONTH_DAY" on the face of the Gazette in which either the Act was originally published or in which the amending, lapsing or repealing instrument was published. Where any segment of the reference string contains only zeros, it means that information is not relevant, not made available, or unavailable.
* Unbolded grey text in square brackets is additional information provided by LegalB.
* "..." indicates further information not provided by LegalB for purpose of brevity
* An Asterisk indicates uncertainty regarding information, and a double asterisk indicates information must be read in the light of our relevant Commentary.
TOP

Copyright © Rita V. Felgate 2018